“The movement to
merge the education of children with and without disabilities is based on the
belief that to enter the dialogue of citizenship does not require spoken, or
indeed outspoken, language. Rather, communication is built on one's ability to
listen deeply to others” (3)
By including these children in a typical
classroom they are teaching all of the students that just because someone is
developmentally different, they are still capable of learning, such as by
listening as the article suggests. I remember in elementary school our class
always had integrated children from the special education classroom. I never
really understood them as different. They acted just like the other classmates
did. In essence, having all of the students learn in the same environment as
the article mentions is truly effective and proves that it strengthens
communication and learning. Then, the community will gradually reform and not
view developmentally or physically different people as disabled, but rather as
abled.
“Rather, the mind is forever dynamic, emerging through the multiple relationships formed and re-formed between children and their surroundings. As such, it makes no sense to define any single individual as intellectually defective. The presumed defectiveness exists not as an intrinsic commodity of the child whose thoughts fail to fit within the perceived static border of normality. Rather, the idea of defect emerges from culturally devalued sets of relationships that that child has with his or her surroundings (i.e., teachers, peers, and materials)” (7)
The picture above represents all of the people involved in the child's psychological developement, even if those people are unaware of it. All children are observant and reflect the actions of those around them, which affects their developemental learning process.
“A sense of reciprocity or shared value exists in
relationships in which individuals, including those with the most severe
disabilities, are recognized as thinking, feeling, caring human beings with
personalities all their own. Though we may construe such traits to be intrinsic
characteristics of the person that then set the conditions for citizenship, in
actuality they cannot emerge, or indeed exist, apart from one's connection to
the community” (10).
This section
of the article means that not all people innately have kind-hearted
personalities. They have to experience caring treatment from other people. Then
they mirror these actions and adapt the qualities. I believe this part of the
article insinuates that in general, most people think that people who have a
disability are automatically nice. However, towards the end of the quote, it
says that these disabled people need a community involvement in order to attain
these qualities. In essence, they need social communication where they learn
how to connect to people. This “sense of reciprocity” needs to exist in school.
If children feel welcome, they are more apt to want to learn. Therefore,
students with Down Syndrome and other mental/physical defects should be invited
into the typical classroom setting in order for the rest of the children to
understand they are capable of learning as well, despite that their developmentally
different. This will make the disabled students feel welcome and motivated to
learn and socialize with the other students. Again, this will move toward the
idea of looking at them as abled rather than disabled.
This video support Kliewer's article and proves that students labeled with disablities are not much different than the rest of the children.
In the video, it is said that children with Down Syndrome have:
"Reading and writing just like the rest of his third grade classmates"
"most children with down syndrome have moderate learning disablities"
"Children with Down Syndrome learn to read and do math in much the same order as typical children." They are mostly "visual" learners"
In the video it also says "classmates were likely be more accepting of people with disabilities"
The website at the end of the video is linked in the blog.
The beginning of the website says "diversity...challenging stereotypes"....like our class :]
Lastly, what were some of your experiences in Elementary, middle or high school? Did you have an inclusive group of students? Do you think they were integrated in the classroom well enough so they learned effectively, just as if they were like the rest of the children in the classroom?
Lastly, what were some of your experiences in Elementary, middle or high school? Did you have an inclusive group of students? Do you think they were integrated in the classroom well enough so they learned effectively, just as if they were like the rest of the children in the classroom?
No comments:
Post a Comment